[1]张明.文学作品的现实性[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019,44(05):37-43.
 ZHANG Ming.The Reality of Literary Works[J].Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Social Sciences),2019,44(05):37-43.
点击复制

文学作品的现实性
分享到:

《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1001-5035/CN:33-1011/C]

卷:
第44卷
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
37-43
栏目:
现实主义文论重释与反思
出版日期:
2019-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Reality of Literary Works
文章编号:
1001-5035(2019)05-0037-07
作者:
张明
浙江师范大学 人文学院,浙江 金华 321004
Author(s):
ZHANG Ming
College of Humanities, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
关键词:
现实性创作阅读反映论建构
Keywords:
reality creation reading the theory of reflection construction
分类号:
I206.7
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
一切文学作品都具有现实性,这种现实性体现在两个方面。第一个方面是文学创作的现实性。传统的文学创作观基本上属于反映论,反映论是一种本质主义认识论,即主张生活具有某种本质和规律,文学的任务则是反映这种本质和规律。现代主义和后现代主义文学的创作观则是反本质主义的,表现为无中心、内在化,但创作的本意还是在于传达这个世界的真实。两种创作观背后都有一个现实,只是它们关于现实的看法有差异。第二个方面是文学的接受。在接受的层面,所有文学都具有当代性,有历史和社会意义。文学的解读语境制约着文学意义的阐发,同时,阅读者对世界的看法也影响了文学的解读。文学构成了社会大文本的一部分,在某种意义上它是这一大文本的子文本,我们对文学的解读不能脱离其背后的社会文化语境。
Abstract:
All literary works have the factors of reality, which are reflected in two aspects. The first aspect is literary creation. The traditional view of literary creation is based on the theory of reflection, which is a kind of essentialism advocating that life has certain essence and law, and the task of literature is to reflect this essence and law. The view of modernism and postmodernism literature is anti-essentialism, which is embodied as being acentric and internalized, but the original intention of creation is still to convey the deeper facts of this real world. There is reality behind both views, even though their views of reality are different. The second aspect is the acceptance of literature. At the level of acceptance, all literature is, in a sense, contemporary, and thus has historical and social meanings. The interpretation of literature is restricted by the context, and is affected by readers’ views as well. Literature is a part of the society, and the interpretation of literature cannot be separated from the social and cultural context behind it.

参考文献/References:

[1]韦勒克. 批评的诸种概念[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2015:212.
[2]艾布拉姆斯. 序[M]//艾布拉姆斯.镜与灯. 郦雅牛,张照进,童庆生,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015:4.
[3]柏拉图. 理想国[C]//伍蠡甫.西方文论选.上海:上海译文出版社,1979:35.
[4]亚里斯多德. 诗学[C]//伍蠡甫.西方文论选.上海:上海译文出版社,1979.
[5]歌德. 诗与真[C]//伍蠡甫.西方文论选.上海:上海译文出版社,1979:446.
[6]伍蠡甫.西方文论选[C].上海:上海译文出版社,1979:347-380.
[7]哈桑. 后现代转向[M].刘象愚,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2015:39-69.
[8]海德格尔. 尼采[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[9]巴赫金.文学作品的内容、材料与形式问题[M]//巴赫金.巴赫金全集:第一卷.石家庄:河北教育出版社,1998:208.
[10]加洛蒂.论无边的现实主义[M].吴岳添,译.上海:上海文艺出版社,1986:167.
[11]姚斯.走向接受美学[C]//姚斯,霍拉勃.接受美学与接受理论.沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1987:19.
[12]伽达默尔.真理与方法[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2016.
[13]海德格尔.林中路[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2015:245.
[14]保罗?利科.前言[M]//保罗?利科.虚构叙事中时间的塑形.王文融,译.北京:商务印书馆,2018:5.
[15]瓦尔特?比梅尔.前言[M]//瓦尔特?比梅尔.当代艺术的哲学分析.孙周兴,李媛,译.北京:商务印书馆,2012:2.
[16]高玉.论“反懂”的文学欣赏[J].文艺理论研究,2005(4):100-107.
[17]高玉.《城堡》无主题论[J].浙江师范大学学报(哲社版),2015(4):1-10.
[18]艾耶尔,麦基.逻辑实证主义及其遗产[M]//麦基.思想家.北京:生活?读者?新知三联书店,1992:170.
[19]瓦尔特?比梅尔.当代艺术的哲学分析[M].孙周兴,李媛,译.北京:商务印书馆,2012:276.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈玉兰,郭少辰.《随园诗话》论学问与创作[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019,44(06):53.
 CHEN Yulan,GUO Shaochen.On the Relation between knowledge and Creation by Suiyuan Poetry Talks[J].Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Social Sciences),2019,44(05):53.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目 “语言变革与中国现当代文学发展”( 16ZDA190)
作者简介:张明(1990—),男,浙江乐清人,浙江师范大学人文学院博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-30