[1]刘玉山.论英国政府的南海政策(1920—1975)——以英国“外交部档案”为中心[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019,44(05):91-99.
 LIU Yushan.On the British Government’s Policy on the South China Sea (1920-1975): Focusing on British Foreign Office Archives[J].Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Social Sciences),2019,44(05):91-99.
点击复制

论英国政府的南海政策(1920—1975)——以英国“外交部档案”为中心
分享到:

《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1001-5035/CN:33-1011/C]

卷:
第44卷
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
91-99
栏目:
历史学
出版日期:
2019-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the British Government’s Policy on the South China Sea (1920-1975): Focusing on British Foreign Office Archives
文章编号:
1001-5035(2019)05-0091-09
作者:
刘玉山
温州医科大学 马克思主义学院,浙江 温州 325025
Author(s):
LIU Yushan
College of Marxism, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China
关键词:
英国南海斯巴特列岛安波沙洲主权声索
Keywords:
UK South China Sea Spratley Amboina Cayclaim for sovereignty
分类号:
K561.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
作为并不显眼的涉事方,英国政府将其在19世纪六七十年代以来在南海踏查的斯巴特列岛和安波沙洲作为主权声索的对象,英国政府对法国20世纪20—30年代在南海的扩张虽奉行平衡牵制政策,实际上则是绥靖政策。20世纪50—70年代,英国政府内部主权声索的倾向抬头,但最终英国政府还是识时务地并没有公开提出主权声索,一方面表明其所谓证据难以自圆其说,另一方面也反映了英国政府较为务实的一面。
Abstract:
As a non-conspicuous party, the British government regards Spratley and Amboina Cay, which have been visited in the South China Sea since the 1960s and 1970s, as the object of its claim for sovereignty, while the British government pursued a policy of balance and restraint in the expansion of France in the South China Sea in the 1920s and 1930s, but in fact it was a policy of appeasement. In the 1950s and 1970s, the tendency of sovereignty voice within the British government increased, but ultimately the British government did not publicly claim for sovereignty in the current situation. On the one hand, it showed that the so-called evidence was difficult to justify, on the other hand, it also reflected the more pragmatic aspect of the British government.

参考文献/References:

[1]赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2008:4.
[1]CHEMILLIER-GENDREAU M.Sovereignty Over the Paracel and Spratly Islands[M]. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2000.
[2]谭玉华.二战前法国南中国海政策的演变[J].东南亚研究,2012(5):61-65.
[3]Files of the Peking Legation: Sovereignty of China over Paracel Islands[G]//Foreign Office Files for China(1930—1937)。The National Archives, UK,Archival code:FO 676/85.
[4]Paracel Islands: French Claim to Sovereignty[G]//Foreign Office files for Japan(1931—1945).The National Archives, UK,Archival code: FO 262/1824.
[5]浦野起央.南海诸岛国际纷争史[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2017:145.
[6]Sovereignty of Off-shore Islands of China[G]//Foreign Office Files for China(1949—1956).The National Archives, UK,Archival code: FO 262/1824.
[7]张艳梅.20世纪20年代英法在欧洲安全问题上的合作与冲突研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2009:14.
[8]HANCOX D, PRESCOTT VSecret Hydrographic Surveys in the Spratly Islands[M].London: ASEAN Academic Press, 1999:94.
[9]韩振华我国南海诸岛史料汇编[M].北京:东方出版社,1988:192.
[10]Claims by China to Islands of South China Seas[G]//Foreign Office Files for China(1957-1966)The National Archives, UK,Archival code:FO 371/127311.
[11]Territorial Disputes of China, January-February 1974(Folder 1)[G]//Foreign Office Files for China(1967-1980)The National Archives, UK,Archival code:FCO 21/1242.
[12]Territorial Disputes of China, March-June 1974(Folder 2)[G]//Foreign Office Files for China(1967-1980)The National Archives, UK,Archival code: FCO 21/1243.
[13]The Spratly Islands Dispute(The Philippine, South Vietnamese, PRC, and Taiwanese Claims to the Spratly Islands are Motivated by National Prestige and Interest in Undersea Resources; Should Future Oil Explorations Reveal a Potential in the Area, France and the UK may lay Claim to the Islands, and Malaysia might Claim the Southernmost Islands of the Group)[EB/OL].[2019-09-09].http://tinyurl.gale.com/tinyurl/Befxj7.Accessed 9 Sept.2019.

相似文献/References:

[1]王瑞红.近代早期英国商人的家庭教育及时代新质[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2017,42(04):113.
 WANG Ruihong.On Family Education and New Quality of Early Modern English Merchants[J].Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Social Sciences),2017,42(05):113.
[2]周旭东,车致远.债务问题与大国关系(1917—1940)[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019,44(04):114.
 ZHOU Xudong,CHE Zhiyuan.On the Debt Problem and Relationships Between the Great Powers(1917—1940)[J].Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Social Sciences),2019,44(05):114.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目“近代以来中国‘琉球、钓鱼岛归属问题撰述’的整理与研究(1874—2017)”(18AZS021)
作者简介:刘玉山(1979—),男,安徽蚌埠人,温州医科大学马克思主义学院副教授,史学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-30